As the civil war in Syria enters its eighth year, nearly 60 percent of its population live in neighboring Lebanon. The Syrian conflict has created reversed gender roles in families resulting in physical and sexual violence. According to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and the International Rescue Committee (IRC) the six types of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) includes rape, sexual assault, physical assault, early and forced marriages, denial of resources or services, and psychological/emotional abuse. All have detrimental effects on refugees, migrants, and their host communities. It is important to remember that the psychological trauma, ill health, poverty and unwanted pregnancy victims experience create life-threatening consequences. June 19th is the International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict. As we commemorate this day and remember those affected by this violence, we must bring attention to this specific population and the lives that are impacted daily. Actual metrics are difficult to confirm due to the social stigma associated with SGBV, the personal security of the survivors, and the reluctance to seek treatment. However, based on 2017 UNHCR studies of Syrian refugees in Lebanon, we know that the risk of SGBV is greater among unaccompanied girls and adolescents, single mothers, young mothers, and females with special needs. These studies report that 25 percent of sexual assault and violence survivors were girls under the age of 18. Men ranging from 10 to 80 years old, gay, bisexual and other male refugees, are also victims of sexual violence. Over 50 percent of Syrian refugees in Lebanon live in extreme poverty and are totally reliant on humanitarian aid. As a result, most of the refugee population lives on $4 a day. This poverty contributes to child labor and encourages some employers to halt wage payments in demand for sexual favors and other forms of blackmail. In order to combat SGBV in these impoverished communities, increased awareness among government and humanitarian agencies is needed. Additionally, viable prevention strategies and protection of survivors against intimidation and reprisal must be implemented. Victims should be entitled to specialized medical and psychosocial care, legal services, and safe environments. If survivors are involved in delivering training to medical personnel, greater protection against SGBV and a more effective response to the needs of the population can be achieved. By strengthening the coordination between government, UN and NGO agencies will meet the immediate and long-term mental health needs of the victims, which are key to saving and rebuilding the lives of survivors. Since the start of the Syrian crisis, SeraphimGLOBAL, a U.S. based NGO in Lebanon, has delivered victim-centered education and training in the clinical management of rape and other forms of violence. The curriculum educates medical and health professionals about the unique and critical mental and physical health needs of the SGBV population. The training includes trauma informed interview techniques surrounding stigma, reproductive health complications as a result of rape, and long term mental disorders that survivors endure. The International Day for the Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict is a time to reflect on this type of violence which is occurring in Lebanon, but also in conflict zones all over the world. By recognizing the unique needs of this population and creating the appropriate programs and services, we can then lead survivors down the path of recovery and to leading productive lives. About the author: Nabil Watfa, Ph.D., is the Director of Health and Humanitarian assistance programs in SeraphimGLOBAL’s Lebanon office. SeraphimGLOBAL is a U.S. based NGO focusing on health and human rights.

But it’s difficult to think about value when we have no buoy for understanding it outside our traditional lenses: for example, our time, our job, and what others tell us they are worth in cash. This, largely, is the world’s paradigm for value so far. But understanding what value really means changes everything—and will be at the center of the decentralized revolution in global coordination that will unfold over the next decade. So, where do we begin?

Let’s start with gold.

Gold is an inherent value. When backing a market, gold allows us to grow a balanced economy well into the trillions. But why does it allow for massive stable markets to form around it? It is gold's permanence that creates stability. We understand that gold will always have value, because it is inherent in all of us, not just in one part of the world, but everywhere, not just today, but tomorrow and for the long haul.

In the 1930s when the gold standard was removed, we learned that the U.S. dollar didn’t need gold to back its economy to flourish. We learned that it was just a symbol for U.S. citizens to decentralize their coordination around the United States economy.

It turns out, common agreement is a philosophy for building shared economy.

And so it seems inherent value is a marker for us to begin exploring what the future could look like—a future beyond gold and the existing realm of credit. And so what else has inherent value? Is education as valuable as gold? What about healthcare? What about a vote that can’t be tampered with? What about an ID that can’t be stolen or erased? What about access to nutrition or clean water? You will find value everywhere you look.

It turns out, we’ve already done the legwork necessary to uncover the most elemental inherent values: The Sustainable Development Goals are commitments grown out of the drive to bring to life basic tenets of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights—the closest possible social contract we have to a global, common agreement.

We’ve already agreed, as a global community, to ensure inclusive and equitable access to quality education. We’ve already agreed to empower all women and girls, to ensure pure and clean water access for all, to promote health at all stages of life, and to end hunger.

We’ve already agreed.

Our agreements are grounded in deep value centers that are globally shared, but undervalued and unfulfilled. The reason for this is our inability to quantify intangible value. All of these rich, inherent values are still nebulous and fragmented in implementation—largely existing as ideals and blueprints for deep, globally shared common agreement. That is, we all agree education, health, and equality have value, but we lack common units for understanding who and who is not contributing value—leaving us to fumble in our own, uncoordinated siloes as we chase the phantoms of impact. In essence, we lack common currencies for our common agreements.

Now we find ourselves at the nexus of the real paradigm of Blockchain, allowing us to fuse economics with inherent value by proving the participation of some great human effort, then quantifying the impact of that effort in unforgeable and decentralized ledgers. It allows us to build economic models for tomorrow, that create wholly new markets and economies for and around each of the richest of human endeavors.

In late 2017 at the height of the Bitcoin bubble, without individual coordination, planning, or the help of institutions, almost $1 trillion was infused into blockchain markets. This is remarkable, and the revolution has only just begun. When you realize that Blockchain is in a similar stage of development as the internet pre-AOL, you will see a glimpse of the global transformation to come.

Only twice in the information age have we had such a paradigm shift in global infrastructure reform—the computer and the internet. While the computer taught us how to store and process data, the Internet built off that ability and furthered the conversation by teaching us how to transfer that information. Blockchain takes another massive step forward—it builds off the internet, adding to the story of information storage and transfer—but, it teaches us a new, priceless and not yet understood skill: how to transfer value.

This third wave kicked off with a rough start—as happens with the birth of new technologies and their corresponding liberties. Blockchain has, thus far, been totally unregulated. Many, doubtless, have taken advantage. A young child, stretching their arms for the first couple times might knock over a cookie jar or two. Eventually, however, they learn to use their faculties—for evil or for good. As such, while it’s wise to be skeptical at this phase in blockchain’s evolution, it’s important not to be blind to its remarkable implications in a post-regulated world, so that we may wield its faculties like a surgeon’s scalpel—not for evil or snake-oil sales, but for the creation of more good, for the flourishing of commonwealth.

But what of the volatility in blockchain markets? People agree Bitcoin has value, but they don’t understand why they are in agreement, and so cryptomarkets fluctuate violently.  Stable blockchain economies will require new symbolic gold standards that clearly articulate why someone would agree to support each market, to anchor common agreement with stability. The more globally shared these new value standards, the better.

Is education more valuable than gold? What about healthcare or nutrition or clean water?

We set out in 2018 to prove a hypothesis—we believe that if you back a cryptocurrency economy with a globally agreed upon inherent value like education, you can solve for volatility and stabilize a mature long lasting cryptomarket that awards everyone who adds value to that market in a decentralized way without the friction of individual partnerships.

What if education was a new gold standard?

And what if this new Learning Economy had protocols to award everyone who is helping to steward the growth of global education?

Education is a mountain. Everyone takes a different path to the top. Blockchain allows us to measure all of those unique learning pathways, online and in classrooms, into immutable blockchain Learning Ledgers.

By quantifying the true value of education, a whole economy can be built around it to pay students to learn, educators to create substantive courses, and stewards to help the Learning Economy grow. It was designed to provide a decentralized way for everyone adding value to global education to coordinate around the commonwealth without the friction of individual partnerships. Imagine the same for healthcare, nutrition, and our environment?

Imagine a world where we can pay refugees to learn languages as they find themselves in foreign lands, a world where we can pay those laid off by the tide of automation to retrain themselves for the new economy, a world where we can pay the next generation to prepare themselves for the unsolved problems of tomorrow.

Imagine new commonwealth economies that alleviate the global burdens of poverty, disease, hunger, inequality, ignorance, toxic water, and joblessness. Commonwealths that orbit inherent values, upheld by immutable blockchain protocols that reward anyone in the ecosystem stewarding the economy—whether that means feeding the hungry, providing aid for the global poor, delivering mosquito nets in malaria-ridden areas, or developing transformative technologies that can provide a Harvard-class education to anyone in the world willing to learn.

These worlds are not out of reach—we are only now opening our eyes to the horizons of blockchain, decentralized coordination, and new gold standards. Even though coordination is the last of the seventeen sustainable development goals, when solved, its tide will lift for the rest—a much-needed rocket fuel for global prosperity.

“Let us raise a standard to which the wise and the honest can repair.”  —George Washington
The views presented in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent the views of any other organization.